Monday, March 6, 2017

The Impact of the Trump Administration on the Future of Nutrition & Dietetics

By: Reanna Peterman

The new administration brings a lot of questions to health professionals and what may occur in the next four years. Here’s the short answer - it’s unpredictable. President Trump and Republican politicians have made numerous statements regarding food, nutrition, and health care. We now face a Republican dominated Presidency, Senate, and House, which may lead to a lot of changes. We cannot possibly predict what the Trump administration has in store for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Affordable Care Act (ACA). What we can do is look at messages from the President’s campaign and past trends with a GOP controlled government. In this article, I will break down what we can assume about the new administration and its implications for the field of dietetics.

Once Trump was inaugurated, the conservative House scrambled to gather a “kill” list of regulations Trump could overturn in the first 100 days of presidency.  Given that the Republicans are in charge of both the Senate and the House, it is possible that they can overturn these regulations with the President’s permission.

Regulations at risk are:
    National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program: Nutrition Standards for All Foods Sold in Schools as Required by the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act 2010
    Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Label
    Public Health Prevention Fund

Obviously, all of these regulations are important for the field of nutrition, but to what extent could the consequences be? Let’s break it down.

1.   National School Lunch Program & School Breakfast Program: Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act 2010 (HHFKA)

Photo Credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/usdagov/

The Obama administration has had a pivotal role in the world of food and nutrition. Michelle Obama paved the way by taking action on the obesity epidemic and made a huge impact through public awareness. She literally reshaped the school lunch & breakfast programs and made changes with progressive policies. The House of Republicans has been eager to repeal the HHFKA and have stated that the act is “burdensome and unworkable”. Cutting the HHFKA would have catastrophic effects on school nutrition and food security. Currently, the HHFKA enforces evidenced-based nutrition requirements for school lunch and breakfast meals. The act also prevents junk food loopholes by prohibiting unhealthy snacks at fundraising events. One of the most important issues HHFKA addresses is student food insecurity by providing free meals to poverty stricken kids. Currently, 44% of all SNAP (food stamp) participants are children. HHFKA allows high-poverty schools to serve all students free meals without excessive paperwork. This makes it easy for schools to participate and provides students with ⅓ of their nutritional needs during the school day. Here’s where things get a little dark - if the HHFKA was to be repealed, all of those wonderful benefits would go away. School lunches could be sent back to the days of pizza and french fries. Food insecurity would sky-rocket in the schools that previously relied on the HHFKA to feed the children. For many food insecure students, school lunch is the only meal they will have all day. Students would go hungry and all of Michelle Obama’s hard work would be squandered. So far, only Republicans have made statements about repealing the HHFKA, Trump has not made an opinion on the topic yet. While Trump may be a fast-food lover, he has stayed quiet on this issue. Unfortunately, the Republican controlled House and Senate may be able to repeal the act without the Presidents assistance.

2. Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Label

Before Obama left office, several acts were put into place regarding food labeling and food safety. The FDA established major rules that include: revoking the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), updating the Nutrition and Supplements Facts panel, and issuing a regulation for calorie labeling on restaurant menus and vending machines. These new rules are huge for the world of nutrition. Here’s why - PHOs are a manufactured form of trans fat and are harmful to human health. The updated nutrition facts label reflects new scientific information and makes it easier for consumers to make informed decisions. Menu labeling, similar to the new nutrition label, provides awareness to consumers and gives people the tools to make educated choices. Overall, these new rules are taking major strides in a healthier direction. They provide Americans with the means to be more aware of their food while also preventing unhealthy fats from being used by manufacturers. Compared to the HHFKA, these new rules are not as hot a topic but Trump’s nominee, Representative Tom Price (R-Ga), has just been confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services. The new secretary has been a vocal opponent of many health issues including: The ACA, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) a sweeping reform of food safety laws, and menu labeling regulation. Currently, it’s expected for Price to focus on health care reform but the possibility still exists that the FDA’s new rules could be revoked.

3. Public Health Prevention Fund (PHPF)

You may have never heard of this fund before but let me tell you, it’s important! This massive fund covers everything from chronic disease prevention to clean air and water. The PHPF was created as a part of the ACA and it is the nation's first mandatory funding of our public health system.

Here are some of the awesome things that the PHPF funds:
    Protects children and adults through immunizations.
    Reduces premature births.
    Funds local solutions to the leading causes of death and disability, including food and waterborne illness.
    Prevents childhood lead poisoning.
    Implements heart disease, stroke, and diabetes prevention programs.
    Helps older adults manage chronic diseases.
    Reduces tobacco use and raises awareness of risks of secondhand smoke.
    Improves children’s physical activity and nutrition.
    Youth suicide prevention.
    Entirely funds Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH)
    REACH reduces racial and ethnic health disparities in addition to increasing access to fruit and vegetables.
    Entirely funds Health and Human Services Block Grant
    Provides 50 states, DC, two American Indian tribes, and eight US territories with funding to address local public health needs.
Connors, N. 2017. What the PHPF Does. [Webinar] http://www.dialogue4health.org/web-forums/detail/the-new-administration

Yeah, that’s a long list. On top of all that, the PHPF now funds 12% of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) budget. To put that into perspective, if the PHPF was repealed, the CDC would lose over $5 billion in the next 5 years. But that’s not all. Over the next 10 years, the PHPF would provide $14 billion to improve public health and chronic diseases. States would lose over $3 billion.

Here’s a graphic depicting how much states rely on the PHPF. 

Photo Credit: http://healthyamericans.org/reports/prevention-fund-state-facts-2017/

Here’s why you should be concerned. The PHPF was targeted before back in 2016. Republicans would have successfully removed the PHPF if it wasn’t for Obama who vetoed it. Unfortunately, since the PHPF is a part of the ACA, there is a large possibility that the fund could go under the chopping block yet again. President Trump has made his views of the ACA very clear and this puts the PHPF in a precarious position. Eliminating the PHPF would cause a chain of events that would ripple throughout the United States. The PHPF supports all Americans and helps promote many nutrition programs. Unfortunately, human health and wellbeing are not considered civil rights and nutrition falls under that category. That is why nutrition professionals should be advocating on behalf our field and promoting the values of nutrition.

It’s not all doom and gloom

I hope I haven’t left you feeling like all is lost and that nutrition will be left by the wayside but it is important for you to know the facts. The future of the dietetic profession could be drastically affected by the new administration. It is our job as professionals to be aware of what’s going on. Right now, I am calling you to action. This is not the time to sit back and stick your fingers in your ears while going “LaLaLaLaLa”. No, this is the time to step up and advocate for yourself and for nutrition. Don’t worry. There are lots of ways you can take action without even leaving your computer. Here’s a list of advocacy tools that you can take advantage of right at your desk.


If you want to do more, here are some suggestions from Don Hoppert from the American Public Health Association.

    Letters to Congress with state information
    Phone calls
    Hill visits or meetings in your district during recess
    Join sign-on letters
    Social media – share your letters, and other advocacy activities on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media platforms


Hoppert, Don. 2017. Advocacy Activities for Public Health Advocates. http://www.dialogue4health.org/uploads/resources/Hoppert_012517.pdf

I wish you all the best of luck in your advocating efforts. Stand strong and don’t give up on what you believe in.

Sources:

No comments:

Post a Comment